February 15, 2011

Screening letters, by the numbers

One of the jobs I am getting used to in my new role of editor is monitoring letters sent to the Press-Republican.

It's not as easy as it might seem.

We receive between 2,000 and 3,000 letters a year, a hearty number for a paper our size.

The people of the North Country have a lot to say about local, national and international issues, and we give them three forums to do so.

There is the traditional Letter to the Editor. Those can be no longer than 300 words — we are strict about this or we would never fit all the letters in. In my first week, I had to send about six letters back for shortening. They were all in the range of 550 to 800 words.

Because Letters to the Editor are signed, writers can express themselves strongly as they make their points. We watch for length, libel and other problems, but most of the letters run.

As another option, readers of the articles we put online can add comments, as long as they give a valid e-mail address. We have a limit of 150 words, and the comments are screened beforehand — and sometimes deleted for reasons detailed in our online policy.

People can also e-mail comments to Speakout. With that, you have only 100 words, and most of those are edited down. Because they are totally anonymous, we are especially discriminating with them.

While the biggest content issues we deal with, as far as opinions are concerned, come from the online comments and Speakouts, letters to the editor present some tough choices too. I am used to dealing with sticky issues from years as news editor; the dilemmas just differ a bit in this office.

Take a letter that arrived last week. His intent was to criticize Chris Mathews, Lawrence O'Donnell, Rachel Maddow and Ed Shultz, "renowned liberals." The problem was that he did so using references to toilets, regurgitation, laxatives and words of a similar vein.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
  • lois_clermont.jpg The rush on Election Day

    We thought Barack Obama or Mitt Romney would mess us up Tuesday night, but it was actually Bill Owens who did, Editor Lois Clermont writes.

    November 8, 2012 1 Photo

  • lois_clermont.jpg Editing Speakout is challenging

    Speakout is overwhelmingly popular, emphasis on overwhelming, Editor Lois Clermont writes.

    April 21, 2012 1 Photo

  • lois_clermont.jpg First Box isn't about winning a race

    The Internet has put local media outlets in a competitive situation, but accuracy still must be more important than speed, Editor Lois Clermont writes.

    January 2, 2012 1 Photo

  • lois_clermont.jpg Never without a book

    I remember the magical feeling when, as a kid, I had saved up enough money for a new book and got to go to the back of Marie Beemer's stationery store on Brinkerhoff Street to make my selection, Editor Lois Clermont says.

    August 1, 2011 1 Photo

  • lois_clermont.jpg Reporting on youth crimes

    The death of Karen Bourdon on May 1, allegedly at the hands of her 14-year-old son, raised a number of ethical questions in our newsroom.

    June 11, 2011 1 Photo

  • lois_clermont.jpg Misconceptions about the Press-Republican

    Everyone has their pet peeves at work. Over the years, I have heard a few generalizations about the Press-Republican that are frustrating, Editor Lois Clermont writes.

    May 2, 2011 1 Photo

  • Column: Decisions made more difficult by Internet

    One of the many difficult decisions we have to make at the Press-Republican is when to publish the name of someone who dies in an accident or fire, explains editor Lois Clermont.

    March 19, 2011

  • Screening letters, by the numbers

    One of the jobs I am getting used to in my new role of editor is monitoring letters sent to the Press-Republican. It's not as easy as it might seem.

    February 15, 2011