December 12, 2012

Editorial: Snub steroids or be snubbed

Between now and Dec. 31, the more than 600 members of the Baseball Writers Association of America must decide which of the super-elite Major League Baseball players will be inducted next August into the Hall of Fame.

For our part, we’re hoping they say no, decisively, to Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and any other player against whom there is substantial evidence they enhanced their statistics with illegal substances.

To be elected into the hall, 75 percent of the voters must endorse a player. First-time election is rare — players are eligible for election, beginning five years after their retirement, for 20 years. After that, a Veterans Committee may consider them for induction.

Judging by statistics alone, Bonds, Clemens and Sammy Sosa — also eligible for the first time this year — are shoo-ins. Bonds is the all-time home run leader with 762, having passed Babe Ruth at 714 and Hank Aaron at 755. He is also the season-record holder, with 73, and won an astonishing seven Most Valuable Player awards.

Clemens, a pitcher, is ninth on the all-time wins list and third in strikeouts. He, like Bonds, was the best of his generation and among the very best ever.

Sosa hit 609 homers, eighth most ever, and is the only player to hit 60 in a season three times.

But the cloud of steroids hangs darkly over each of them. There is more than a strong suspicion that each took steroids to boost his performance.

They are the highest-profile players to have their lifetime of stellar play questioned by Hall of Fame voters, but they are not the first.

Others, such as Mark McGwire, have not fared well. McGwire, a towering figure during most his career, became that way after using steroids — a fact he has admitted. He has never received more than 24 percent of the Hall of Fame vote, though on numbers alone he’d be a first-ballot breeze.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Cheers and Jeers

Letters to the Editor
In My Opinion

Recent Columns