ELIZABETHTOWN -- Nine environmental groups have joined forces to support legal protection of tax payments on Adirondack and Catskill Forest Preserve land.

What's your opinion? Discuss this story on the EcoBiz forum of North Country BizConnect.

A legal decision in Chautauqua County last year ordered New York to cease tax payments on all state-owned land until they are made fair and equal.

The case, brought by Arkwright Town Supervisor John Dillenburg III, is under appeal but has raised serious concern among Adirondack towns, where much of the land is preserved by law in the State Constitution.

The Dillenburg case goes before the Supreme Court Appellate Division in Rochester next September.

On Tuesday, the court granted permission for the Adirondack Council, Adirondack Landowners Association, Adirondack Mountain Club, Association for the Protection of the Adirondacks, Audubon New York, Catskill Center for Conservation and Development, Open Space Conservancy and Residents' Committee to Protect the Adirondacks to file a joint amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in support of continued tax payments, said John Sheehan, spokesman for the Adirondack Council.

"At stake is more than $70 million in annual property-tax payments to 92 towns, 12 counties and dozens of school districts in the Adirondack Park alone, on 2.7 million acres of constitutionally protected New York State Forest Preserve."

Each group included a statement in the 38-page brief, compiled by Albany attorney Marc S. Gerstman, former chief counsel for the Department of Environmental Conservation.

AFFECTS LAND PURCHASES

The Dillenburg decision, Gerstman says in the brief, has already had a "chilling effect" on additional land acquisitions, with some towns, he said -- specifically naming the Town of Essex -- exercising veto authority to prevent the state from buying more land for addition to the Adirondack Park.

Gerstman crafts his legal argument around 1886 legislation where New York waived "sovereign immunity for taxation" on state lands, pointing to ancient documents that considered the forests "great natural reservoirs" of drinking water for large populations to the south.

"There appears to be no precedent in federal or state law that mandates a state to waive sovereign immunity for taxation purposes," he wrote.

"Once waived, it is up to the local taxing authority to assess and collect taxes on state lands."

Gerstman also takes issue with the "piecemeal" or "jumbled" approach to state-land taxation alleged by Dillenburg.

"The Equal Protection Clause does not require that a state address all aspects of a social problem at once. Reform may take one step at a time, addressing itself to the phase of the problem which seems the most acute."